Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM Nikon on Nikon D800 vs Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD Nikon on Nikon D800 vs Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II on Nikon D800 Nikon 70-200/f2.8 E FL. By north w, Nov 11, 2017. 19. replies. Very fast AF on the D850. Optically sharper wide open than the Tamron G1, but stopped down its only slightly sharper. The Nikon has an consistent sharpness over the whole picture that the Tamron can not mach at any aperture. The main difference is that Nikon is 2x better at AF in With the bodies you list there is unlikely to be much image resolution difference at your main shooting aperture of f8 between your 70-200 f2.8 and the 70-300 FX P. Yh donā€™t know how to update gear list. i have D500+500mm PF, Z6 +24-70mm f/4. 16-35mm f/4, 20mm 1.8g and 70-200mm FL Nikkor FX Zoom Lens Reviews Nikon 70-200mm f/4G AF-S VR Lens Review Ā» What is It? The acronym brigade just doesnā€™t get any shorter these days, does it? Letā€™s start with all those letters: AF-S means internal focus using a silent wave motor. Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II AF-S Nikkor Zoom Lens: Why I HATE the NIKON 70-200 2.8 FL (1 Year Review) This is a one year later review of the Nikon 70-200 2.8e FL Lens. So, iā€™ve had this lens for a year and I still dislike the switch of the zoom and the focus ring. 4oAQKpU. The minimum focus distance is 1.4m, with a maximum magnification of 0.13x, which is a step back from the 1m minimum focus and 0.28x magnification of the most recent 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSM II. All this is topped-off by a price which, while substantially higher than the older lens, is still substantially lower than its Nikon and Canon STS2000 wrote: A lot of negative thoughts (price, interchanging of zoom and focus rings) have been replace with glowing reviews by all. The Angry Photographer, Foo Knows Photo, Thom, and Roger(at LensRental) have been extremely positive, this is a very fine lens. Hi Brian, I have never compared side-by-side the two lenses (I understand you're referring to the 70-200/2.8 S vs the 70-200/2.8 FL, both with a fluorite element). However, if I were in your shoes, I'd buy the FL version; 1) it's been developed for high-res Nikon F-mount bodies (D850) and got excellent reviews, 2) it uses the same 1.4X as the 500 PF (the Z lens needs dedicated Z TCs), 3) the I upgraded my 80-200 f2.8 to the VR1 version of the 70-200 f2.8 and it is outstanding and my most used lens. In my shooting the VR function alone is invaluable. I have not found a reason to move to one of the later versions, which all get steller reviews. My recommendation is moving to any version of the 70-200 f2.8 would be worthwhile. Here is the Sigma 70-200 Sports lens alongside its 70-200mm f/2.8 contemporaries: Positioned above from left to right are the following lenses: Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Lens Sony FE 70-200mm f/2.8 GM OSS Lens Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM Lens Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E AF-S FL VR Lens Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports Lens

nikon 70 200 f2 8 fl review